Airlines Put Price Tag on Aisle, Window Seats |
Olympic Committee: Bring Back Tug of War |
Is College Too Easy? |
3 Wiggles Out, 1 Remains |
“The Romantics” Puts Stars in Regular Duds
Written by Pat's Papers | Friday, 10 September 2010 7:59 AM

If the ladies of “Sex and the City 2” only had a $20,000 wardrobe budget, they’d probably spend the whole movie pantless, in the same shirt with only one shoe each. But the stylist for “The Romantics” managed to outfit the film’s entire cast for cheap, says the New York Post, by shopping at everyday stores like Century 21 and J Crew. The film has some major star power, featuring Katie Holmes, Anna Paquin, and Josh Duhamel. But director Galt Niederhoffer said he wanted to The clothes [to] reflect the personality of the characters people in their late 20s on the verge of adulthood.
![]()
Enter address below to get the morning headlines in your inbox (more details)
Editor's Pick
In Support of the Sitting Ovation
A plea from New York Times’ columnist Ben Brantley: βIβm just asking you, my comrades in urban theatergoing, to think before you stand, if you must stand at all.β
- 5/16 Meet the Meeting Killers
- 5/21 IPO Before 'I Do' for Zuckerberg
- 5/18 Celebrity Skate: The Performance
- 5/18 3 Wiggles Out, 1 Remains
- 5/15 What Pat Looks Like as a New Yorker Cartoon
Favorites
U.S. Newspapers
- USA Today
- Wall Street Journal
- New York Times
- LA Times
- New York Daily News
- New York Post
- Washington Post
- Chicago Tribune
- Houston Chronicle
- San Francisco Chronicle
- Dallas Morning News
- Boston Globe
- Philadelphia Inquirer
- Cleveland Plain-Dealer
- Chicago Sun-Times
- Kansas City Star
- Miami Herald
- San Jose Mercury News
- Baltimore Sun
- Denver Post
- Seattle Times
- Milwaukee Journal Sentinel
- Oklahoman
- Detroit News
- Boston Herald
- Omaha World Herald
- Commercial Appeal
International Newspapers
- International Herald Tribune
- The Times of London
- The Guardian
- The Daily Mail
- The Australian
- Irish Times
- Straits Times
- South China Morning Post
- The Times of India
- The Globe and Mail





blog comments powered by Disqus